The Fourth Edition of UL 1740 “Standard for Robots and Robotic Equipment” was released at the beginning of 2018. The publication of the revised edition marked a significant shift from RIA R15.06 (2012) to the latest edition of ISO 10218 (2011). As you can imagine, this meant a major re-write to the definitions and test specifications within UL 1740 to align with the international robotics standard. This shift will define the shape of the robotics industry for years to come.

Changes to the Standard

The alignment of UL 1740 with ISO 10218 (2011) meant a large portion of changes between editions were to the glossary in order to harmonize with international standards and other UL standards. The most significant revised definition was that of the actual term “robot,” conforming with the definition in ISO 8373 (2012).

The most significant changes

 

3RD EDITION DEFINITION

Automatically controlled, re-programmable multipurpose machine, programmable in several degrees of freedom, which can be either fixed in place or mobile.

 

4TH EDITION DEFINITION

Actuated mechanism programmable in two or more axes with a degree of autonomy, moving within its environment, to perform intended tasks.

 

New safety testing requirements were also added to the new edition, again to align with new and revised international safety standards and to stay ahead of constantly evolving technologies. For example, Clause 40.4.7 was added to allow for Manual High Speed (APV or T2) functions and to be consistent with ISO 10218-1.

In all, significant editorial changes and clarifications throughout changed the way manufacturers, integrators, and users approach the standard.

What Do Organizations Need to Be Aware Of?

Most manufacturers of this type of equipment understand the previous requirements very well but may not have kept up to date with all of the changes to the requirements. It is also important for them to understand the relationship between UL 1740, ANSI / RIA R15.06, CSA Z-434, ISO 10218-1 and other functional safety standards.

Integrators and robot users are not expected to have the same level of understanding of these changes to UL 1740 as manufacturers, because the details of many modifications do not make a big impact to their day-to-day work. Their main responsibility will be in keeping to the original designed safety plan of the manufacturer’s robot in order to maintain compliance to the updated standard.

As a whole, organizations may need to review their current UL 1740 certifications in order to ensure that they are complying with Fourth Edition requirements.

UL 1740: A Guide to Key Updates

Considering the extent of changes to the standard and its potential impact on the robotics and manufacturing industries, TUV Rheinland has developed a whitepaper UL 1740: A Guide to Key Updates outlining the differences between the 3rd and 4th Editions of UL 1740.

Author

DIPL.-ING. THOMAS KOESTER

DIPL.-ING. THOMAS KOESTER

HEAD OF THE TECHNICAL COMPETENCE CENTER INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY

Head of the Technical Competence Center Industrial Machinery at TÜV Rheinland. Studied electrical engineering at the Technical University of Berlin. Started his career in 1996 in the electrical engineering test laboratory of TÜV Rheinland Japan in Yokohama. Since 2005 employed at TÜV Rheinland in Germany in the area of machine safety and laboratory manager for industrial machinery until 2020. Since 2020 global coordinator of the Machinery segment at TÜV Rheinland. Member of German and European committees in the area of machinery safety.

More Posts

Robotik Zukunft

Safety is Still Top Priority – 3 New Robotics Predictions for 2020

From autonomous driving to autonomously acting, pandemic-resistant robots: as the robotics market develops, so do safety standards.
Diversity in Unternehmen

20,000 employees at 500 locations worldwide – #Diversitymatters

Racism and exclusion have no place at TÜV Rheinland. On Instagram the international testing service provider demonstrates its diversity.
co2

Carbon budgets: price determines awareness

What if the various divisions of a business had climate budgets as well as financial ones? A proposal for all those tasked with making decisions.

Comments

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Newsletter

No one likes popups. But you’ll like our newsletter.

Get remarkable articles on digitization, modern life, energy and technology.